Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Upholding the Transfer of Assessment Proceedings u/s 127: A Judicial Perspective
    Case LawsService Tax
    Navigating the Taxation Labyrinth: The Supreme Court's Guidance on Transfer of Right to Use Goods
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture of Earnest-Money Deposits under SARFAESI Rules
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    The Generality vs. Enumeration Principle: A Key to Interpreting Delegated Rule-Making Power: Validit...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Share Premium Addition u/s 68: Demystifying Share Premium Transactions
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Intricacies of Income Tax Penalty u/s 271(1)(c): Fairness in Tax Administration
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Ensuring Fair Procedure before declaring Fraud in Bank Loan: Providing Relevant Documents and Opport...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Reassessment Proceedings: Navigating the Scope and Limitations under Income Tax Act
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Navigating the Complexities of Search and Seizure Assessments: Unraveling the Intricacies of Section...
    Decoding the Judgement: Navigating the Complexities of ITC Eligibility under the GST Regime
    Excess stock found during survey: Navigating the Intricacies of UPGST / CGST Act and Invoking Wrong ...
    Striking a Balance: Judicial Interpretation of GST Provisions on Record-Keeping and Penalties
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Interim Orders and the Limits of Article 142: Safeguarding Natural Justice Balancing Judicial Powers...
    Upholding Fairness and Transparency in Insolvency Resolution: A Landmark Judgment on the IBC
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Supreme Court Clarifies Vicarious Liability of Directors in Cheque Dishonour Cases
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Interim Compensation in Cheque Dishonor Cases: Discretion and Due Process, Scope of the word "May"
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Unraveling the Principles of Delay Condonation: A Comprehensive Analysis by the Supreme Court
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting Section 80G Provisions: ITAT's Stance on Charitable Institution Registration
    Case LawsCustoms
    Monetary Limits for Filing Appeals: Analyzing the CESTAT Judgment on Binding Nature of CBIC Instruct...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting the Scope and Limits of Sections 153A and 153C: A Judicial Perspective
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Transfer of assessment proceedings for coordinated investigations and administrative convenience upheld where procedural safeguards and factual links exist.
    The judgment explains that transfers of assessment proceedings pursuant to the statutory transfer power may be justified for coordinated enquiries and administrative convenience, provided the decision is not capricious or mala fide. Authorities must afford an opportunity to be heard and consider objections; where factual indicia exist - for example, disclosed transactions such as unsecured loans with searched persons - centralisation can be sustained. The convenience of the assessee is relevant but subservient to effective adjudication and tax collection, and transfers supported by procedural compliance and factual nexus are not arbitrary.
    Case LawsService Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Transfer of right to use goods: contracts retaining operational control are service arrangements, not deemed sales under VAT.
    The issue is whether supply agreements for cranes, trailers and tank trucks amount to a transfer of the right to use goods under the deemed sale provision. Applying the five BSNL tests-availability of goods, consensus on identity, transferee's legal right to use, exclusivity of use, and non transferability by owner-the contracts failed to meet the criteria. Contractors retained possession, crew, fuel, maintenance and liability, and transferees had only permissive use without effective control, so the arrangements were services, not deemed sales under VAT/sales tax.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Forfeiture of earnest-money deposits under SARFAESI rules stands as a statutory consequence, limiting equitable intervention.
    The analysis affirms that Rule 9(5) of the SARFAESI Rules prescribes an express statutory forfeiture of earnest-money deposits arising from auction terms, and that Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, addressing contractual damages, do not apply to such statutory forfeitures. Unjust enrichment and equitable considerations cannot supplant a clear statutory forfeiture, and subsequent recovery by the secured creditor does not negate the forfeiture, except in narrowly defined exceptional circumstances where equity may justify relief.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Generality vs. enumeration principle affirms broad delegated rule making power, upholding rules that further an Act's statutory purposes.
    The Court held that Rule 9(3) is intra vires because the general delegated rule making power in section 29A(1) authorises rules that carry out the Act's purposes even when not covered by enumerated heads. Applying the generality vs. enumeration principle, the Court found the enumerated matters in section 29A(2) illustrative and not restrictive, and concluded Rule 9(3) furthers the misconduct chapter's object of maintaining ethical standards and preventing wrongful threshold dismissal of genuine complaints.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Burden of proof in share premium cases: failure to prove investor identity and genuineness sustains addition under section 68.
    The assessment of share premium under section 68 requires the assessee to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of investors who subscribe at a premium. The court scrutinised disparate allotments made on consecutive days, examined subscribing companies' financials, and applied the doctrine of "source of source" restrictively, holding that incorporation papers or bank payments alone do not discharge the burden. Absent cogent evidence tracing funds to lawful origin and demonstrating commercial rationale for large premiums, additions under section 68 are supportable.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Strict construction of penalty provisions prevents penalty where taxpayer disclosed omitted income before assessment notice.
    The legal focal point is whether Section 271(1)(c) can be invoked where an assessee disclosed omitted income and paid differential tax before initiation of reassessment. Penal provisions require strict construction, and Explanation 1 treats a pre-notice satisfactory explanation and admission of additional income as accepted, precluding characterization as concealment. Additionally, a penalty notice must specify the particular ground for proceeding; failure to do so renders the notice defective and undermines the basis for penalty.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Right to be heard: affected parties must receive documents underlying fraud allegations and be allowed inspection and rebuttal.
    Classification of a loan account as fraud invokes the Principles of Natural Justice, requiring disclosure of the documents forming the basis of a Show Cause Notice and inspection access to bank and Resolution Professional records so the affected party can identify required documents, receive copies, and submit a meaningful reply within specified timelines, with scope to request a personal hearing.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Scope of reassessment: AO may address newly noticed income but remains constrained by the recorded reasons for reopening.
    Where the AO has recorded reasons to believe income escaped assessment, the AO may assess or reassess issues that come to notice during reassessment, but if no additions or modifications are ultimately made in respect of the issues that formed the basis for reopening, the AO cannot make additions or modifications relating solely to other matters that were part of the original assessment. Explanation 3 applies only after reassessment power is validly invoked and cannot be used to deviate from or supplant the recorded reasons.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Corroboration requirement for search statements: unsupported search statements cannot sustain additions without linked incriminating material and fair cross examination.
    Additions for alleged accommodation entries cannot rest solely on statements recorded during search operations; such statements require corroboration by material found in the search that is specifically linked to the assessee. The assessing officer must articulate a factual nexus between seized group material and the assessee, and procedural fairness-including provision of relevant statements and opportunity for cross-examination-is essential. Cure provisions do not validate jurisdictional defects arising from absence of requisite notice or lack of incriminating material.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit eligibility clarified: refund for unutilised ITC limited to inverted duty where input goods tax exceeds output supplies.
    The court construes Section 54(3) narrowly: refund of unutilised ITC for inverted duty arises only where tax on input goods exceeds tax on output supplies. It upholds the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) and Section 16(4), confirms that ITC is subject to legislatively prescribed conditions and time limits, and clarifies that the non-obstante clause in Section 16(2) does not override separate restrictions such as Section 16(4). Affected petitioners may invoke circulars and have eligible ITC claims processed where returns met the prescribed extended filing position.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Determination of tax on unaccounted stock must proceed under Sections 73 and 74, not Section 130.
    The Court held that tax determination for excess or unaccounted stock discovered in a survey must proceed under the statutory assessment procedures for undisclosed goods rather than by invoking the survey provision. The assessment code prescribes the exclusive mechanism for quantifying and demanding tax, and survey powers cannot be used to supplant the prescribed steps for computation, notice and imposition of tax or penalty on unaccounted goods.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Record-keeping obligations: failure attracts a capped statutory penalty and invalidates arbitrary confiscation without due process.
    The judgment emphasises that registered persons must maintain prescribed books and electronic records under Section 35 and related rules, and that any determination of tax on unaccounted goods must follow the show cause procedures for assessing tax liability. It finds that conditions for confiscation under Section 130 were not met and that penalties must be imposed in accordance with the statutory bifurcation in Section 122, with the offences in question attracting only the capped penalty, thereby underscoring procedural limits on enforcement powers.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Limits on Article 142: extraordinary power cannot automatically vacate interim stays; natural justice and supervisory jurisdiction must be preserved.
    Limits on the Supreme Court's extraordinary jurisdiction were defined to prevent blanket, time based vacation of interim stays; equitable power cannot deprive non parties of substantive benefits or negate the right to be heard. The Court confined vacation rules to cases where interim relief was granted without notice, instructed High Courts to grant limited ad interim relief, prioritise vacation applications, avoid routine time bound disposal directives, and recognised that past automatic vacations that led to concluded trials raise finality concerns while endorsing judicial superintendence and natural justice as constitutional constraints.
    Case LawsIBC
    Show AI Summary
    Insolvency plan compliance: failure to acknowledge creditor claims or secure approvals undermines approved resolution plans.
    The court held that a recall application grounded in lack of notice and alleged misrepresentation is maintainable under principles of natural justice. It found the resolution plan non-compliant with Section 30(2) read with Regulations 37 and 38-specifically for failing to acknowledge a creditor's claim, misrecording the payable amount, omitting secured creditor classification despite a charge, and proposing use of third-party statutory land without necessary approvals-deficiencies that materially affected the plan's transparency and treatment of creditor classes.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Vicarious liability of directors clarified: specific averments required to link a director to company affairs before liability attaches.
    The Court held that vicarious liability of a director in cheque dishonour cases cannot be invoked by merely reproducing statutory language or alleging directorship; complaints must contain specific factual averments showing how the director was responsible for or in charge of the company's day to day affairs to link the director to issuance or dishonour of negotiable instruments.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Interim compensation discretion: courts must prima facie assess claims and defences before ordering payment under Section 143A.
    The Court interpreted Section 143A(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act as conferring a discretionary power to order interim compensation, holding that the word "may" cannot be read as mandatory. Courts must prima facie assess the complainant's case and the accused's defence; the presumption under section 139 alone does not suffice. Interim compensation may be directed only when a prima facie case is established, with the quantum determined after considering transaction nature, parties' relationship, and the accused's paying capacity, and brief reasons must be recorded.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Condonation of delay: courts require sufficient cause, balancing strict limitation rules with liberal remedial discretion.
    Principles of condonation of delay require balancing the Limitation Act's public policy against stale litigation: Section 3 is to be strictly interpreted while Section 5 is to be construed liberally to allow judicial discretion where sufficient cause is shown. Discretion remains limited by considerations such as inordinate delay, negligence, and lack of due diligence, and prior decisions granting condonation do not automatically justify relief unless the factual matrices are substantially similar.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Registration under Section 80G: provisional approval permits subsequent final registration regardless of prior commencement of activities.
    The Tribunal held that institutions granted provisional approval under the First Proviso to Section 80G(5) are entitled to apply for final registration under the proviso's final-registration clause, and that the relevant date of commencement is to be counted from activities undertaken after grant of provisional registration; a prior commencement of activities before provisional grant cannot alone justify rejection of a final-approval application.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Binding nature of departmental instructions vs natural justice: tribunals may prioritize procedural fairness over monetary thresholds.
    The CESTAT held that CBIC instructions bind departmental officers but do not bind courts and tribunals, which must safeguard natural justice. The Tribunal found the appellate order defective for failing to remit valuation reassessment to the proper officer as statutorily required, treated related Bills of Entry as a single transaction for monetary limit calculation, and invoked its procedural power to hear departmental appeals on merits despite the Board's monetary threshold.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Search assessment provisions under Sections 153A and 153C override ordinary reassessment time limits; asset-threshold verification required.
    The judgment holds that search-triggered assessment provisions function as non-obstante clauses displacing ordinary reassessment time limits, distinguishes the enduring liability to tax from the temporal right to assess, prescribes that block periods are computed from the year of search (or date of receipt of seized records for non-searched persons), and treats the asset-represented income threshold as a mandatory, aggregable precondition requiring the assessing officer's recorded satisfaction.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters
      Money Laundering

      Reporting Entity under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)

      9 May, 2023

      Contents
      Notifications
      Acts
      Plus +
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

       Section 2 - Definitions.

      Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002

      Role and Responsibilities of Reporting Entity

      Preamble 

      Introduction & Overview of Prevention of Money Laundering Act

      Origin & Object of PMLA

      Objective is to curb acts of moneylaudering & to punish the offender

      PMLA, 2002 came into force w.e.f 1st July 2005 and has undergone several amendments till now.

       • It extends to whole of India including Jammu and Kashmir

      • Preamble is to prevent money-laundering and provide for confiscation of property derived from, Or involved in money-laundering and to punish those who commit the offence.

       

      Defination of Money Laundering

       Means any act of acquiring untainted property or disguising financial assets

      • According to Section 3 Read with rule 2 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act

      – “whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of crime including its concealment, possession, acquisition or use and projecting or claiming it as untainted property shall be guilty of offence of money

      Laundering.

      • Money laundering involves disguising financial assets so that they can be used without detection of the illegal activity that produced them.

       

      Process of Money Laundering: Placement, Layering & Integration

      1. Placement (depositing into banks)

      Dirty money being inserted in financial system. The first stage is the physical disposal of cash. The launderer introduces his illegal profits into the financial system. This placement is accomplished by depositing the cash in domestic banks or in other types of formal or informal financial institutions.

      1. Layering (making shell companies causing rotation of money)

      Separates the proceeds from their criminal origin by moving them through a series of financial transactions. The Second stage in money laundering is layering. The launderer engages in a series of conversions or movements of the funds to distance them from their source. Shell companies (i.e. paper companies/bogus companies) serve as front and are registered in offshore havens. They are a common tool in the layering phase.

      1. Integration(acquiring legitimate explanation through investments, loans etc)

      Creating a legitimate explanation for their sources of funds, allowing them to be retained, invested or used, to acquire goods or assets. This is the stage where the funds are returned to the legitimate economy for later extraction. Examples include investing in a company, purchasing real estate, luxury goods, etc. This is the final stage in the process.



       

      Reporting Entity

      To strength the control and achieve the desired goal, the concept of reporting entity is introduced w.e.f. w.e.f. 15-2-2013 to the PMLA, 2002

      Accordingly, clause (wa) to section 2(1) read as:-

      (wa) "reporting entity" means a banking company, financial institution, intermediary or a person carrying on a designated business or profession;

      Thus, as per clause (wa) the following persons are made reporting entity under PMLA

        • a banking company (see clause (e))
        • a financial institution (see clause (i))
        • an intermediary (see clause (n))
        •  a person carrying on a designated business or profession (see clause (sa) hereinbelow:)

      Simultaneously, clause (sa) inserted to section 2(1) to define the scope and meaning of “person carrying on designated business or profession" introduced as:

      (sa) "person carrying on designated business or profession" means,-

      (i) a person carrying on activities for playing games of chance for cash or kind, and includes such activities associated with casino;

      (ii) Inspector-General of Registration appointed under section 3 of the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908.) as may be notified by the Central Government;

      (iii) real estate agent, as may be notified by the Central Government;

      (iv) dealer in precious metals, precious stones and other high value goods, as may be notified by the Central Government;

      (v) person engaged in safekeeping and administration of cash and liquid securities on behalf of other persons, as may be notified by the Central Government; or

      (vi) person carrying on such other activities as the Central Government may, by notification, so designate, from time to time;


      Notified Persons / Reporting entities u/s 2(1)(sa)

      With the passage to time, Ministry of Finance of the Central Government is notifying more and more category of persons as reporting entity as:

      1.       As per notification dated 24-9-2014 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

      Looping of reporting entity

        • any person carrying on the business, either on its own behalf or on behalf of other reporting entities,
        • of storing, safeguarding and retrieving the records of the documents mentioned in clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 12 of the said Act and the rules made thereunder
        • shall be deemed to be a person carrying on designated business or profession

      2.       Notification No. 2/2015 dated 15-4-2015 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

        • any person, licensed by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority
        • to perform the functions as specified in regulation 3 or regulation 4 or regulation 5 of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Insurance Brokers) Regulations, 2002,
        • shall be deemed to be a "person carrying on designated business or profession"

      3.       Notification no. 3/2015 dated 17-4-2015 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(ii))

        • a Registrar or Sub-Registrar appointed under section 6 of the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908)
        • as a "person carrying on designated business or profession".

      4.         Notification no. 4/2017 dated 23-8-2017(Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iv))

                         From 23-8-2017 to 5-10-2017

        • dealer in precious metals, precious stones and other high value goods
        • having a turnover of rupees two crore in a financial year
        • as a person carrying on designated business or profession.

      This notification has been rescinded vide notification dated 6-10-2017

      5.       Notification No. 8/2017 dated 15-11-2017 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iii))

                         From 15-11-2017 to 27-12-2020

        • ‘real estate agents’ as defined under clause (zm) of section 2 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (No. 16 of 2016)
        • shall be deemed to be a “person carrying on designated business or profession”

       Interestingly, the meaning of ‘real estate agents’ has been defined u/s 2(1)(va) of PMLA, which has reference to section 65(88) of Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994 (Known as Service Tax Act) which has already been repealed, the impugned notification make a reference to RERA Act.

      This notification has been rescinded vide notification dated 28-12-2020 

      6.         Notification No. 3/2018 dated 4-5-2018 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

        •  the Multi-State Co-operative Society registered under the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 (39 of 2002)
        • designated as a “person carrying on designated business or profession”.

      7.         Notification dated 28-12-2020 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iv))

        • the dealers in precious metals, precious stones as persons carrying on designated businesses or professions
        • if they engage in any cash transactions with a customer equal to or above Rupees ten lakhs, carried out in a single operation or in several operations that appear to be linked.

      8.         Notification dated 28-12-2020 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iv))

                         From 28-12-2020 to 28-11-2022

        •  the “Real Estate Agents”, as a person
        • engaged in providing services in relation to sale or purchase of real estate and having annual turnover of Rupees twenty lakhs or above,
        • as “persons carrying on designated businesses or professions”.

      This notification has been rescinded vide Notification dated 29-11-2022

      9.         Notification dated 29-11-2022 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iii))

                         From 29-11-2022

        •  ‘real estate agents’
        • as defined under clause (zm) of section 2 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (16 of 2016) and as a person engaged in providing services in relation to sale or purchase of real estate and having annual turnover of Rupees twenty lakhs and above,
        • as a “person carrying on designated business or profession”.

      Interestingly, the meaning of ‘real estate agents’ has been defined u/s 2(1)(va) of PMLA, which has reference to section 65(88) of Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994 (Known as Service Tax Act) which has already been repealed, the impugned notification make a reference to RERA Act.

      10.         Notification dated 7-3-2023 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

        • activities when carried out for or on behalf of another natural or legal person in the course of business as an activity for the purposes of said sub sub-clause, namely:-

      (i) exchange between virtual digital assets and fiat currencies;

      (ii) exchange between one or more forms of virtual digital assets;

      (iii) transfer of virtual digital assets;

      (iv) safekeeping or administration of virtual digital assets or instruments enabling control over virtual digital assets; and

      (v) participation in and provision of financial services related to an issuer’s offer and sale of a virtual digital asset.

      Explanation:- For the purposes of this notification “virtual digital asset” shall have the same meaning assigned to it in clause (47A) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961).

      11.       Notification dated 3-5-2023 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

      Practicing CA, CS, CWA included in the list as:

        •  the financial transactions carried out by a relevant person on behalf of his client, in the course of his or her profession, in relation to the following activities-

      (i) buying and selling of any immovable property;

      (ii) managing of client money, securities or other assets;

      (iii) management of bank, savings or securities accounts;

      (iv) organisation of contributions for the creation, operation or management of companies;

      (v) creation, operation or management of companies, limited liability partnerships or trusts, and buying and selling of business entities,

      shall be an activity for the purposes of said sub-section.

      Explanation 1.- For the purposes of this notification ‘relevant person’ includes –

      (i) an individual who obtained a certificate of practice under section 6 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (38 of 1949) and practicing individually or through a firm, in whatever manner it has been constituted;

      (ii) an individual who obtained a certificate of practice under section 6 of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 (56 of 1980) and practicing individually or through a firm, in whatever manner it has been constituted;

      (iii) an individual who has obtained a certificate of practice under section 6 of the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 (23 of 1959) and practicing individually or through a firm, in whatever manner it has been constituted.

      Explanation 2.- For the purposes of this notification ‘firm’ shall have the same meaning assigned to it in sub-clause (i) of clause (23) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961).

      12.       Notification dated 9-5-2023 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

      Specified activities notified - Reporting entity

       Following activities when carried out in the course of business on behalf of or for another person, as the case may be, as an activity for the purposes of said sub-clause, namely:-

      (i) acting as a formation agent of companies and limited liability partnerships;

      (ii) acting as (or arranging for another person to act as) a director or secretary of a company, a partner of a firm or a similar position in relation to other companies and limited liability partnerships;

      (iii) providing a registered office, business address or accommodation, correspondence or administrative address for a company or a limited liability partnership or a trust;

      (iv) acting as (or arranging for another person to act as) a trustee of an express trust or performing the equivalent function for another type of trust; and

      (v) acting as (or arranging for another person to act as) a nominee shareholder for another person.

      Explanation.–For removal of doubts, it is clarified that the following activities shall not be regarded as activity for the purposes of sub-clause (vi) of clause (sa) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Act, namely:-

      (a) any activity that is carried out as part of any agreement of lease, sub-lease, tenancy or any other agreement or arrangement for the use of land or building or any space and the consideration is subjected to deduction of income-tax as defined under section 194-I of Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961); or

      (b) any activity that is carried out by an employee on behalf of his employer in the course of or in relation to his employment; or

      (c) any activity that is carried out by an advocate, a chartered accountant, cost accountant or company secretary in practice, who is engaged in the formation of a company to the extent of filing a declaration as required under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 7 of Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013); or

      (d) any activity of a person which falls within the meaning of an intermediary as defined in clause (n) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003).

       

      Also see:

      Role and Responsibilities of Reporting Entity



      Note:

      The above list is prepared for general information purpose only by TMI, for more information please check the original notifications issued by the Government.

      More notification u/s 2(1)(sa) may follow the list. 

      Customized search

       

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax