Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsCustoms
    Decoding the Interplay of Customs Duty, Interest, and Confiscation Proceedings
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Validity of Assessment u/s 153C: Reckoning the Limitation Period
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting 'Initiation' of Penalty Action u/s 275(1)(c): Period of Limitation
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Faceless Assessment: Decoding the Exemptions for International Tax Charges
    Interpreting Rule 86A: Safeguarding Taxpayers' Rights in ITC Blocking
    Writ Jurisdiction Not a Shortcut to Bypass Tax Adjudication Process, Rules Court: Judicial Disciplin...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Decoding the Interplay of Sections 153A and 153C in Search Assessments: Limitation and Reassessment ...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Customs Valuation and Classification: Upholding Due Process and Objective Assessment
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Income Tax Case Transfers: Place of Business vs. Registered Office: Determining the Appropriate Juri...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Validity of Writ Petitions and Section 153C Proceedings: Examining the High Court Judgment
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interpreting Time Limits for 80G Registration for Charitable Institutions: Avoiding Absurdity in the...
    Unraveling the Web: Forgery, Fake GST Firms, and the Pursuit of Economic Justice
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Interplay between the provisions of Section 153C and Section 147: Limits on Automatic Reassessment i...
    Decoding the GST Forgery Case: Balancing Personal Liberty and Safeguarding Public Interest for Grant...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Equity and Justice in Tax Matters: Condonation of Bona Fide Delays
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Embracing Equity in Tax Laws: Recognizing Genuine Difficulties in Condonation of Delays in filing of...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Recovery Proceedings Against Legal Heirs of Sole Proprietors: Invalidity of Demand Notices Issued Ag...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Jurisdiction of DRI Officers: Supreme Court Upholds Section 97 of Finance Act 2022 validating Custom...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Dissecting the Legality of IGST on Ocean Freight for FOB Imports: Refund of IGST
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Real Income Taxation: Avoiding Double Disallowance of Wages and Salaries Payable
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Customs duty liability on redemption: assessment under Section 28 triggers interest under Section 28AB for delayed payment.
    The court concluded that duty liability arises when an owner redeems confiscated goods under Section 125(2), while the procedural assessment and determination of that duty can be carried out under Section 28, and that the interest provision of Section 28AB applies where Section 28 is invoked for such duties; the Jagdish Cancer ratio does not preclude applying Section 28 in confiscation-redemption assessments.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Limitation under Section 153C: six-year period runs from receipt of seized documents, requiring assessment under Section 153C.
    Where seized assets, documents and digital data recovered from a third party are found to relate to another person, the date on which the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction receives those seized materials is the deemed date of search for reckoning the six-year limitation period; that deemed date determines the relevant assessment year and which prior six assessment years fall under the special procedure for initiating assessments under Section 153C.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Initiation of penalty proceedings: limitation runs from the Assessing Officer's reference, barring belated penalty orders.
    Initiation of penalty proceedings occurs when the Assessing Officer makes a reference to the competent authority; the subsequent show cause notice is a procedural opportunity and does not restart the limitation period, so the statutory limitation for completing penalty proceedings runs from the date of the Assessing Officer's reference and a penalty order passed after that period is time barred.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Faceless assessment procedure must govern issuance of Section 148 notices in international tax matters, irrespective of residency.
    The court held that the plain language of the faceless scheme, Section 144B(2) and the CBDT order requires that issuance of Section 148 notices in matters involving international tax charges comply with the mandatory faceless assessment procedure, irrespective of the taxpayer's residency status, and that notices issued without adherence to that procedure are inconsistent with the statutory scheme.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    ITC blocking under Rule 86A: restricts orders to credit presently available in the electronic credit ledger, limiting retrospective blockage.
    Rule 86A(1) functions as a temporary protective mechanism that may be invoked only where input tax credit is currently available in the taxpayer's electronic credit ledger and the officer has reasons to believe that such present credit has been fraudulently availed or is ineligible; the expression "amount equivalent to such credit" must be read together with the condition of availability in the ECL and does not authorise retrospective blocking of ITC already utilised or refunded.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Exhaustion of statutory remedies prevents direct writ challenges to tax demands absent exceptional circumstances or factual disputes.
    The court held that exhaustion of statutory remedies bars writ relief where efficacious alternate remedies exist and where resolution requires factual or classification inquiries; finding no exceptional circumstances to bypass the statutory process, the court dismissed the writ petitions but granted liberty to the petitioners to pursue statutory remedies, including filing responses to show cause notices or appeals against adjudication orders within the period allowed, subject to compliance with prescribed conditions such as pre-deposit obligations.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Reassessment limitation: commencement depends on AO's recorded satisfaction, not the search date, for non-searched entities.
    Reassessment of a non-searched entity under Section 153C must be measured from the date the Assessing Officer records satisfaction about the seized material's relevance to that entity, not from the date of the search when the same AO is involved; the proviso to Section 153A(1) prevents the extended limitation period introduced by the 2017 amendment from applying to searches before the statutory cutoff, and physical handover of materials is a machinery provision rather than the substantive commencement trigger.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Transaction value protection: declared import price accepted; principal-use classification of motor controllers affirmed after procedural defects in reassessment were found
    The tribunal upheld the declared transaction value, finding that the authority enhanced assessable value without following statutory procedures and without proving non-comparability; NIDB assessed-value data alone was insufficient. On classification, the motor controllers were held to be parts principally used with electric motors and correctly classed under CTH 8503, with explanatory notes and the principal-use test displacing revenue's attempt to treat them as vehicle accessories.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Place of business controls assessment jurisdiction; transfer permitted where incriminating materials were seized in that jurisdiction.
    When incriminating materials seized in a particular circle are directly connected to an assessee's business activities and essential to assessment, the assessing authority may transfer proceedings to the circle where those materials were seized. The decision emphasizes that place of business-reflecting where operative evidence and activities occurred-can control assessment jurisdiction, and that transfer facilitates a coordinated investigation while procedural safeguards like show cause notices and opportunities to reply remain relevant.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Writ jurisdiction preserved where exceptions to alternative remedies exist; defective Section 153C compliance undermines post-search assessments.
    The court analysed when High Court writ jurisdiction may be exercised despite alternative remedies, reiterating exceptions for violations of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or fundamental rights. It examined Section 153C procedural requirements, particularly the necessity of a valid satisfaction note by the Assessing Officer of the searched person, time limits and jurisdictional competence, and the limited evidentiary value of loose sheets and retracted statements absent corroboration.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Time limits for 80G registration: purposive interpretation prevents existing charities being barred and preserves merit-based verification.
    The Tribunal construed the amended registration scheme to hold that the six month filing period tied to commencement of activities applies to newly formed institutions that have not begun activities, not to existing charities that obtained provisional approval; it required the assessing authority to treat applications filed within six months before provisional approval expiry as within time and to verify eligibility on merits, providing opportunity to supply documents.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Admissibility of custodial disclosures: discovery linked statements can be admitted, shaping jurisdiction and bail in GST fraud cases.
    The summary addresses three operative legal points: admissibility of custodial disclosures limited to parts directly leading to discovery of material items; jurisdictional inquiry in multi state economic offences founded on connections between the complainant, place of lodging the FIR and links to accused and firms; and stringent bail evaluation in large scale economic crimes considering gravity, evidence, punishment, risk of tampering, accused's influence and public interest, applied to a scheme of forged GST firms and bogus invoices.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Non obstante clause in third party search provision applies only after the AO assumes jurisdiction by issuing a notice.
    The Assessing Officer of the other person must record satisfaction that incriminating material relates to that person's total income for specific assessment years before issuing a third party notice; the non obstante clause in the third party provision applies only after the Assessing Officer assumes jurisdiction by issuing such a notice and does not oust regular reassessment provisions where jurisdiction under the third party scheme is not assumed.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Bail in economic offences: stricter scrutiny where circumstantial financial links to proceeds of crime risk investigation and public interest.
    The court examined bail appropriateness where applicants allegedly knowingly received and concealed proceeds from a large-scale GST fraud involving fake registrations and bogus invoices. It treated unexplained transactions as strong circumstantial evidence of complicity and applied a heightened bail regime for serious economic offences, weighing gravity of offence, public fund loss, evidence strength and risk of tampering. Gender or familial ties were held insufficient to justify leniency when individuals are shown to have benefited from proceeds of crime.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Condonation of delay: bona fide short technical glitches in filing income tax returns warrant equitable condonation by authorities.
    The High Court held that a one day, bona fide delay in filing an income tax return due to a technical portal glitch could not be rejected merely because the return had been processed with a demand; such reasoning was misconceived. Applying earlier authorities that endorse an empathetic and non rigid approach, the court emphasised that short delays caused by genuine human or technical problems should be condoned in exercise of administrative discretion, reinforcing the primacy of equity and justice in condonation applications for returns.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Condonation of delay: personal illness of a tax professional can justify relief in filing income tax returns.
    The summary establishes that under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, delay in filing returns caused by personal difficulties of a chartered accountant (such as illness of a family member) can be a genuine reason for discretionary condonation; authorities should assess such claims sensitively, require reasoned disbelief if rejecting medical evidence, and interpret discretionary tax powers in light of equity, substantial justice and harmonious construction.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Invalidity of notices to deceased persons prevents recovery from legal heirs absent specific statutory machinery enabling continuation.
    Issuance of a demand or show cause notice to a deceased sole proprietor is a jurisdictional defect because notice to the correct person is a condition precedent under the Customs Drawback Rules; absent a statutory machinery provision or voluntary submission by legal representatives, recovery of erroneously availed drawback and penalties cannot be pursued against legal heirs.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Jurisdiction of revenue intelligence officers affirmed: legislative validation sustains past customs show cause notices as constitutionally permissible.
    The Court concluded the defect identified in Canon India is unfounded when Notification No. 44/2011 and amended Section 17 are read together, distinguishing assessment functions under Section 17 from recovery under Section 28, and held that Section 97 of the Finance Act, 2022 validly and purposively validates past show cause notices issued by DRI and similarly situated officers, with retrospective application limited to the object of validation and passing Article 14 tests of reasonable classification and proportionality.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    IGST on ocean freight invalid where IGST already paid on import value, preventing double taxation under valuation rules.
    The court held that where IGST has been paid on the value of imported goods inclusive of cost, freight and insurance under Section 5(1) of the IGST Act read with the Customs Act, the CIF/FOB distinction is immaterial and a notification provision seeking separate IGST on ocean freight for FOB imports cannot be sustained, reinforcing fiscal neutrality and preventing double taxation.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Timing difference in wage provisions prevents double disallowance; actual payment deductible after reversal.
    Where provisions for wages and salaries are reversed in the return and actual payments are later made and evidenced, those entries represent a timing difference rather than inherently bogus expenditure; treating the same item as disallowable in the earlier year and again disallowing the later payment would result in double disallowance contrary to the taxation of real income.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters
      Money Laundering

      Reporting Entity under Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA)

      9 May, 2023

      Contents
      Notifications
      Acts
      Plus +
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

       Section 2 - Definitions.

      Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002

      Role and Responsibilities of Reporting Entity

      Preamble 

      Introduction & Overview of Prevention of Money Laundering Act

      Origin & Object of PMLA

      Objective is to curb acts of moneylaudering & to punish the offender

      PMLA, 2002 came into force w.e.f 1st July 2005 and has undergone several amendments till now.

       • It extends to whole of India including Jammu and Kashmir

      • Preamble is to prevent money-laundering and provide for confiscation of property derived from, Or involved in money-laundering and to punish those who commit the offence.

       

      Defination of Money Laundering

       Means any act of acquiring untainted property or disguising financial assets

      • According to Section 3 Read with rule 2 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act

      – “whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of crime including its concealment, possession, acquisition or use and projecting or claiming it as untainted property shall be guilty of offence of money

      Laundering.

      • Money laundering involves disguising financial assets so that they can be used without detection of the illegal activity that produced them.

       

      Process of Money Laundering: Placement, Layering & Integration

      1. Placement (depositing into banks)

      Dirty money being inserted in financial system. The first stage is the physical disposal of cash. The launderer introduces his illegal profits into the financial system. This placement is accomplished by depositing the cash in domestic banks or in other types of formal or informal financial institutions.

      1. Layering (making shell companies causing rotation of money)

      Separates the proceeds from their criminal origin by moving them through a series of financial transactions. The Second stage in money laundering is layering. The launderer engages in a series of conversions or movements of the funds to distance them from their source. Shell companies (i.e. paper companies/bogus companies) serve as front and are registered in offshore havens. They are a common tool in the layering phase.

      1. Integration(acquiring legitimate explanation through investments, loans etc)

      Creating a legitimate explanation for their sources of funds, allowing them to be retained, invested or used, to acquire goods or assets. This is the stage where the funds are returned to the legitimate economy for later extraction. Examples include investing in a company, purchasing real estate, luxury goods, etc. This is the final stage in the process.



       

      Reporting Entity

      To strength the control and achieve the desired goal, the concept of reporting entity is introduced w.e.f. w.e.f. 15-2-2013 to the PMLA, 2002

      Accordingly, clause (wa) to section 2(1) read as:-

      (wa) "reporting entity" means a banking company, financial institution, intermediary or a person carrying on a designated business or profession;

      Thus, as per clause (wa) the following persons are made reporting entity under PMLA

        • a banking company (see clause (e))
        • a financial institution (see clause (i))
        • an intermediary (see clause (n))
        •  a person carrying on a designated business or profession (see clause (sa) hereinbelow:)

      Simultaneously, clause (sa) inserted to section 2(1) to define the scope and meaning of “person carrying on designated business or profession" introduced as:

      (sa) "person carrying on designated business or profession" means,-

      (i) a person carrying on activities for playing games of chance for cash or kind, and includes such activities associated with casino;

      (ii) Inspector-General of Registration appointed under section 3 of the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908.) as may be notified by the Central Government;

      (iii) real estate agent, as may be notified by the Central Government;

      (iv) dealer in precious metals, precious stones and other high value goods, as may be notified by the Central Government;

      (v) person engaged in safekeeping and administration of cash and liquid securities on behalf of other persons, as may be notified by the Central Government; or

      (vi) person carrying on such other activities as the Central Government may, by notification, so designate, from time to time;


      Notified Persons / Reporting entities u/s 2(1)(sa)

      With the passage to time, Ministry of Finance of the Central Government is notifying more and more category of persons as reporting entity as:

      1.       As per notification dated 24-9-2014 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

      Looping of reporting entity

        • any person carrying on the business, either on its own behalf or on behalf of other reporting entities,
        • of storing, safeguarding and retrieving the records of the documents mentioned in clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 12 of the said Act and the rules made thereunder
        • shall be deemed to be a person carrying on designated business or profession

      2.       Notification No. 2/2015 dated 15-4-2015 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

        • any person, licensed by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority
        • to perform the functions as specified in regulation 3 or regulation 4 or regulation 5 of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Insurance Brokers) Regulations, 2002,
        • shall be deemed to be a "person carrying on designated business or profession"

      3.       Notification no. 3/2015 dated 17-4-2015 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(ii))

        • a Registrar or Sub-Registrar appointed under section 6 of the Registration Act, 1908 (16 of 1908)
        • as a "person carrying on designated business or profession".

      4.         Notification no. 4/2017 dated 23-8-2017(Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iv))

                         From 23-8-2017 to 5-10-2017

        • dealer in precious metals, precious stones and other high value goods
        • having a turnover of rupees two crore in a financial year
        • as a person carrying on designated business or profession.

      This notification has been rescinded vide notification dated 6-10-2017

      5.       Notification No. 8/2017 dated 15-11-2017 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iii))

                         From 15-11-2017 to 27-12-2020

        • ‘real estate agents’ as defined under clause (zm) of section 2 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (No. 16 of 2016)
        • shall be deemed to be a “person carrying on designated business or profession”

       Interestingly, the meaning of ‘real estate agents’ has been defined u/s 2(1)(va) of PMLA, which has reference to section 65(88) of Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994 (Known as Service Tax Act) which has already been repealed, the impugned notification make a reference to RERA Act.

      This notification has been rescinded vide notification dated 28-12-2020 

      6.         Notification No. 3/2018 dated 4-5-2018 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

        •  the Multi-State Co-operative Society registered under the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 (39 of 2002)
        • designated as a “person carrying on designated business or profession”.

      7.         Notification dated 28-12-2020 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iv))

        • the dealers in precious metals, precious stones as persons carrying on designated businesses or professions
        • if they engage in any cash transactions with a customer equal to or above Rupees ten lakhs, carried out in a single operation or in several operations that appear to be linked.

      8.         Notification dated 28-12-2020 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iv))

                         From 28-12-2020 to 28-11-2022

        •  the “Real Estate Agents”, as a person
        • engaged in providing services in relation to sale or purchase of real estate and having annual turnover of Rupees twenty lakhs or above,
        • as “persons carrying on designated businesses or professions”.

      This notification has been rescinded vide Notification dated 29-11-2022

      9.         Notification dated 29-11-2022 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(iii))

                         From 29-11-2022

        •  ‘real estate agents’
        • as defined under clause (zm) of section 2 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (16 of 2016) and as a person engaged in providing services in relation to sale or purchase of real estate and having annual turnover of Rupees twenty lakhs and above,
        • as a “person carrying on designated business or profession”.

      Interestingly, the meaning of ‘real estate agents’ has been defined u/s 2(1)(va) of PMLA, which has reference to section 65(88) of Chapter V of Finance Act, 1994 (Known as Service Tax Act) which has already been repealed, the impugned notification make a reference to RERA Act.

      10.         Notification dated 7-3-2023 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

        • activities when carried out for or on behalf of another natural or legal person in the course of business as an activity for the purposes of said sub sub-clause, namely:-

      (i) exchange between virtual digital assets and fiat currencies;

      (ii) exchange between one or more forms of virtual digital assets;

      (iii) transfer of virtual digital assets;

      (iv) safekeeping or administration of virtual digital assets or instruments enabling control over virtual digital assets; and

      (v) participation in and provision of financial services related to an issuer’s offer and sale of a virtual digital asset.

      Explanation:- For the purposes of this notification “virtual digital asset” shall have the same meaning assigned to it in clause (47A) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961).

      11.       Notification dated 3-5-2023 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

      Practicing CA, CS, CWA included in the list as:

        •  the financial transactions carried out by a relevant person on behalf of his client, in the course of his or her profession, in relation to the following activities-

      (i) buying and selling of any immovable property;

      (ii) managing of client money, securities or other assets;

      (iii) management of bank, savings or securities accounts;

      (iv) organisation of contributions for the creation, operation or management of companies;

      (v) creation, operation or management of companies, limited liability partnerships or trusts, and buying and selling of business entities,

      shall be an activity for the purposes of said sub-section.

      Explanation 1.- For the purposes of this notification ‘relevant person’ includes –

      (i) an individual who obtained a certificate of practice under section 6 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 (38 of 1949) and practicing individually or through a firm, in whatever manner it has been constituted;

      (ii) an individual who obtained a certificate of practice under section 6 of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 (56 of 1980) and practicing individually or through a firm, in whatever manner it has been constituted;

      (iii) an individual who has obtained a certificate of practice under section 6 of the Cost and Works Accountants Act, 1959 (23 of 1959) and practicing individually or through a firm, in whatever manner it has been constituted.

      Explanation 2.- For the purposes of this notification ‘firm’ shall have the same meaning assigned to it in sub-clause (i) of clause (23) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961).

      12.       Notification dated 9-5-2023 (Issued u/s 2(1)(sa)(vi))

      Specified activities notified - Reporting entity

       Following activities when carried out in the course of business on behalf of or for another person, as the case may be, as an activity for the purposes of said sub-clause, namely:-

      (i) acting as a formation agent of companies and limited liability partnerships;

      (ii) acting as (or arranging for another person to act as) a director or secretary of a company, a partner of a firm or a similar position in relation to other companies and limited liability partnerships;

      (iii) providing a registered office, business address or accommodation, correspondence or administrative address for a company or a limited liability partnership or a trust;

      (iv) acting as (or arranging for another person to act as) a trustee of an express trust or performing the equivalent function for another type of trust; and

      (v) acting as (or arranging for another person to act as) a nominee shareholder for another person.

      Explanation.–For removal of doubts, it is clarified that the following activities shall not be regarded as activity for the purposes of sub-clause (vi) of clause (sa) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Act, namely:-

      (a) any activity that is carried out as part of any agreement of lease, sub-lease, tenancy or any other agreement or arrangement for the use of land or building or any space and the consideration is subjected to deduction of income-tax as defined under section 194-I of Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961); or

      (b) any activity that is carried out by an employee on behalf of his employer in the course of or in relation to his employment; or

      (c) any activity that is carried out by an advocate, a chartered accountant, cost accountant or company secretary in practice, who is engaged in the formation of a company to the extent of filing a declaration as required under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 7 of Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013); or

      (d) any activity of a person which falls within the meaning of an intermediary as defined in clause (n) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002 (15 of 2003).

       

      Also see:

      Role and Responsibilities of Reporting Entity



      Note:

      The above list is prepared for general information purpose only by TMI, for more information please check the original notifications issued by the Government.

      More notification u/s 2(1)(sa) may follow the list. 

      Customized search

       

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax