Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2024 (12) TMI 569

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....- 9-10-2024<br>WP (C) NO. 35062 OF 2024 - -<br>GST<br>THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FOR THE PETITIONER : BY ADVS. K.KRISHNA ACHYUTH MENON NIRMAL KRISHNAN FOR THE RESPONDENT : SMT. THUSHARA JAMES (SRGP), SRI. V GIRISH KUMAR (SC) JUDGMENT Petitioner has approached this Court, challenging Ext.P2 order issued under the provisions of Section 74 of the CGST/SGST Acts. 2. Learned counse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on Bench of this Court in W.A. No.429 of 2024 that the Department ought to have proceeded against the suppliers, if the suppliers had not paid the tax collected from the petitioner instead of denying input tax credit to the petitioner. 3. Heard the learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the 4th respondent and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3 also. 4. Havi....