https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762989 Writ interference under Article 226 was declined against a GST assessment order where the dispute concerned whether eligible input tax credit had been wrongly denied on the basis of invoices and whether suppliers had discharged tax. The Court held that it would not undertake a factual inquiry in writ jurisdiction on such matters and that any apparent mistake affecting eligible credit could be pursued by rectification under Section 161, while any challenge that the order was incorrect in law had to be taken through the statutory remedies. en-us Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:15:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762989 Writ interference under Article 226 was declined against a GST assessment order where the dispute concerned whether eligible input tax credit had been wrongly denied on the basis of invoices and whether suppliers had discharged tax. The Court held that it would not undertake a factual inquiry in writ jurisdiction on such matters and that any apparent mistake affecting eligible credit could be pursued by rectification under Section 161, while any challenge that the order was incorrect in law had to be taken through the statutory remedies. Case-Laws GST Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762989