<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 569 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762989</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the Ext.P2 order under the CGST/SGST Acts, which denied the petitioner input tax credit. The court advised the petitioner to pursue rectification under Section 161 or avail other statutory remedies, as it could not assess whether the credit denial or supplier tax payment was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:15:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 569 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762989</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the Ext.P2 order under the CGST/SGST Acts, which denied the petitioner input tax credit. The court advised the petitioner to pursue rectification under Section 161 or avail other statutory remedies, as it could not assess whether the credit denial or supplier tax payment was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>