TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Writ Petition Dismissed: Explore Rectification or Other Remedies for Input Tax Credit Denial Under CGST/SGST Acts.</h1> The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the Ext.P2 order under the CGST/SGST Acts, which denied the petitioner input tax credit. The court advised ... Challenge to order issued under the provisions of Section 74 of the CGST/SGST Acts - denial of input tax credit - HELD THAT:- The petitioner has not made out any case for interference with Ext.P2 order in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. If the petitioner has a case that there has been some mistake in Ext.P2 order and as a result of which certain eligible input tax credit with reference to the invoices mentioned in the reply submitted by the petitioner had not been given to him, it is open to the petitioner to file an application for rectification under Section 161 of the CGST/SGST Acts. If, on the other hand, it is the case of the petitioner that the decision of the 1st respondent is incorrect in law, it is for the petitioner to avail statutory remedies. Instead, the petitioner has chosen to file this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petition dismissed. The petitioner challenged Ext.P2 order under CGST/SGST Acts for denial of input tax credit. Court dismissed the writ petition, stating petitioner can seek rectification under Section 161 or avail statutory remedies. Court cannot examine if credit was denied or if tax was paid by suppliers.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
