TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2023 (5) TMI 804
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nvolved in these appeals are that the appellants engaged in providing various taxable services, defined under the Finance Act, 1994. The appellants avail Cenvat Credit of service tax paid on input services as per the provisions of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. During the disputed period, the appellants had exported the taxable output services to their group companies located abroad. In view of exportation of the services, there was no scope for utilization of Cenvat Credit availed by the appellants on the input services. Therefore, the appellants had filed the refund applications, claiming refund of service tax paid on the input services in terms of Rule 5 ibid read with the notifications issued thereunder. The refund applications were all....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....sesse 12,40,276 E Ineligible input services 46,44,603 F Absence of Nexus 19,15,619 G Reduction in proportionate refund 18,20,195 H CA Certificate not produced 10,00,085 I Not an export service 5,74,045 J Relevant documents not produced 13,27,927 K Mismatch of export proceeds 1,85,068 L Others 1,95,503 Total 2,56,12,391 3. Learned Chartered Accountant appearing for the appellants submitted that the grounds assigned for rejection of the refund claims are not sustainable under the law inasmuch as the entire output services were exported by the appellants and such aspect has not been denied by the authorities below. Thus, he contended that benefit of r....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h finding in the remand proceedings. Thus, it cannot be said that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has recorded specific finding vide order dated 30.12.2016 with regard to consideration of the limited issued as pointed out by the authorities below in this case. Since, in the remand proceedings, the original authority has not dealt with all the issues arising out of the subject refund applications, I am of the view that the matter should go back to the original authority for a fresh fact finding on all the issues involved in the appeal concerning grant of refund benefit to the appellants. In other words, the original authority should look into all the aspects dealt with by the learned Commissioner (Appeals) vide order dated 30.12.2016, whi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....im of refund benefit cannot be whittled down for the procedural lapses. In this context, Rule 9 ibid is aptly clear that if the other requirements provided under the statute are contained in the invoice, the benefit of refund should be allowed by the original authority. Therefore, rejection of the refund benefit on such ground, in my considered opinion, cannot also stand judicial scrutiny. However, since all the disputed invoices were not examined at this stage, I am of the view that ends of justice would be met, if the matter is remanded to the original authority for verification of the invoices for ascertaining whether, the name of the appellants is appearing in all the disputed invoices and thereafter to consider the grant of refund in t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....imed under Rule 5 ibid, holding that nexus aspect cannot be questioned, while considering the refund application filed under Rule 5 ibid. In all these cases, Revenue has not specifically objected to the fact that the appellants had not complied to the requirements provided under Rule 5 ibid, and the notifications issued thereunder, while claiming the benefit of refund, as a result of the exportation of the output services. Thus, such allegations cannot also stand for judicial scrutiny. 6.5. With regard to the particulars itemized in serial No.7,8,9 & 12 in the above chart, both sides agree that the factual aspects involved in those cases should be examined at the original stage. Accordingly, I am of the view that the issues arising out o....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rification of documents at the original stage. E Ineligible input services 46,44,603 Para 6.4 -Appeals allowed, as nexus and eligibility of credit cannot be questioned subsequently, at the time of consideration of the refund applications under Rule 5 ibid. F Absence of Nexus 19,15,619 Para 6.4 -Appeals allowed, as nexus and eligibility of credit cannot be questioned subsequently, at the time of consideration of the refund applications under Rule 5 ibid. G Reduction in proportionate refund 18,20,195 Para 6.5-Matter remanded to the original authority for H CA Certificate not produced 10,00,085 verification of the factual aspects involved in the appeals. I Not an export service 5,74,045 ....