Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (5) TMI 804 - AT - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal allows appeals for refund claims & eligibility, remands invoices, dismisses export service appeal. The Tribunal allowed the appeals for time-barred refund claims, ineligible input services, and absence of nexus, as the refund applications were filed ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal allows appeals for refund claims & eligibility, remands invoices, dismisses export service appeal.

                            The Tribunal allowed the appeals for time-barred refund claims, ineligible input services, and absence of nexus, as the refund applications were filed within the stipulated time frame and the eligibility of credit was not disputed by the department. The Tribunal remanded matters related to invoices and export proceeds for further verification. Appeals regarding not being an export service and non-production of relevant documents were dismissed. The Tribunal directed the original authority to re-adjudicate remanded matters ensuring natural justice and a personal hearing for the appellants.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Refund claim time-barred.
                            2. Invoices not addressed to the registered premises.
                            3. Invoice not in the name of the assessee.
                            4. Ineligible input services.
                            5. Absence of nexus.
                            6. Reduction in proportionate refund.
                            7. CA Certificate not produced.
                            8. Not an export service.
                            9. Relevant documents not produced.
                            10. Mismatch of export proceeds.
                            11. Others.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Refund Claim Time-Barred:
                            The Tribunal found that the refund applications were filed within the stipulated time frame. The relevant date for filing the refund application should be construed as the date of filing at the end of the quarter for which the benefit is claimed. The appeals were allowed as the refund claims were within the permissible period.

                            2. Invoices Not Addressed to the Registered Premises:
                            The Tribunal noted that the invoices demonstrated the name of the appellants. Even if the department's allegation was correct, procedural lapses should not negate the mandatory requirement for a refund. The matter was remanded to the original authority for verification of the invoices to ascertain if the appellants' name appeared in all disputed invoices.

                            3. Invoice Not in the Name of the Assessee:
                            Similar to the issue of invoices not addressed to the registered premises, this matter was also remanded for verification of documents at the original stage.

                            4. Ineligible Input Services:
                            The Tribunal held that the nexus and eligibility of credit could not be questioned subsequently during the consideration of refund applications under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appeals were allowed since the department did not dispute the availment of credit at the material time.

                            5. Absence of Nexus:
                            The Tribunal reiterated that the nexus aspect could not be questioned during the refund application process under Rule 5. The appeals were allowed as the department did not dispute the compliance with Rule 5 requirements.

                            6. Reduction in Proportionate Refund:
                            The Tribunal remanded the matter to the original authority for verification of the factual aspects involved in the appeals.

                            7. CA Certificate Not Produced:
                            The Tribunal remanded the matter to the original authority for verification of the factual aspects involved in the appeals.

                            8. Not an Export Service:
                            The Tribunal dismissed the appeals and sustained the impugned order as the appellants did not press for the benefit of the refund claimed.

                            9. Relevant Documents Not Produced:
                            The Tribunal dismissed the appeals and sustained the impugned order as the appellants did not press for the benefit of the refund claimed.

                            10. Mismatch of Export Proceeds:
                            The Tribunal remanded the matter to the original authority for verification of the factual aspects involved in the appeals.

                            11. Others:
                            The Tribunal remanded the matter to the original authority for verification of the factual aspects involved in the appeals.

                            Conclusion:
                            The appeals filed by the appellants were disposed of with directions for the original authority to adjudicate the remand matters afresh, following the principles of natural justice and granting a reasonable opportunity for a personal hearing. The Tribunal allowed the appeals concerning time-barred claims, ineligible input services, and absence of nexus, while dismissing the appeals on the grounds of not being an export service and relevant documents not produced.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found