Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2003 (11) TMI 640

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... underhand dealings - to be more correct. 2. The petitioner is an IAS officer of the year 1985, sufficiently senior and allotted to Haryana cadre. He has held various assignments of responsibility. In November 1999 about 4000 vacancies of JBT teachers were advertised by the Department of Primary Education, State of Haryana for being filled up through District-Level Selection Committees. Nineteen such Committees were constituted. Applications were invited and short-listed candidates were called for interview in the 19 districts. At the time when the process of selections was initiated and the selections were held, one Shri R.P Chander, IAS, was the Director, Primary Education. In January 2000, he was shifted from the office of Director, P....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....orced to sign such lists. On or about 28-9-2000, these lists were handed over to the petitioner with a direction that such lists should be substituted immediately in place of the original lists. 4. On 7-11-2000, the petitioner opened the almirah which was sealed by Ms Rajni and released the original select lists of candidates. This process was videographed and also photographed. Appointments have been made pursuant to this list. 5. On 3-12-2000, the petitioner was transferred from his post. 6. On 5-6-2003 the petitioner has filed this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking directions for investigation and also protection for the life and liberty of himself and his family members. 7. On 12-6-2003, the writ petition....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the nefarious activities, we have consciously avoided naming them in this order, as the accusation against them is yet to be investigated. 11. From the very first day, the petitioner has been demanding the whole episode to be investigated into by a highly placed independent investigating agency. On behalf of the respondents, it is not denied that an inquiry/investigation is justifiably called for. There are two lists of selected candidates and only one can be genuine and authentic. However, the respondents have insisted on a Commission of Inquiry being set up so that the Commission, preferably headed by a retired Judge of any High Court, may hold an inquiry and find out the correct facts. It was also submitted on behalf of the respondent....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....inquiry/investigation into the averments made by the petitioner, may also be entrusted with inquiry/investigation into the allegations levelled against the petitioner. To this the petitioner has no objection; rather he welcomed the suggestion. 13. We have given our thoughtful consideration to the respondents' proposal for entrusting the whole matter to a Commission of Inquiry, assisted by a special investigating task force. The flaw with Commissions of Inquiry, as revealed by experience, is that they do not have enough teeth and for their functioning they have to depend on the State's assistance. Commissions of Inquiry remain pending for unreasonable lengths of time. The reports submitted do not bind the State and in spite of tra....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ble delay does not prejudice the investigation of the present case. They can think of acting fast for the purpose of collecting such vital evidence, oral and documentary, which runs the risk of being obliterated by lapse of time. The rest can afford to wait for a while. We hope that the investigation would be entrusted by the Director, CBI to an officer of unquestioned independence and then monitored so as to reach a successful conclusion; the truth is discovered and the guilty dragged into the net of law. Little people of this country, have high hopes from CBI, the prime investigating agency which works and gives results. We hope and trust the sentinels in CBI would justify the confidence of the people and this Court reposed in them. 16....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lice Station Sector 17, Chandigarh. (2) Inquiry No. 10 of 3-4-2001, Chandigarh, for alleged misuse of official vehicles and mobile phone by the petitioner Sanjiv Kumar, leading to registration of criminal case under Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. (3) Inquiry No. 31 dated 10-8-2001, Chandigarh, regarding appointment of 36 officials under DPEP by the petitioner resulting in alleged financial loss of Rs. 22,33,466 to the State Government. (4) Inquiry No. 38 dated 20-9-2001, Chandigarh, regarding financial irregularities committed by the petitioner in projects of various items amounting to over Rs. 56 lakhs. (5) Inquiry No. 16 dated 3-9-2002, Chandigarh, regarding disproportionate asset....