<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 640 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298471</link>
    <description>Allegations of manipulation in public appointments, involving competing select lists and the risk of evidence being lost, were considered fit for investigation by the CBI rather than a Commission of Inquiry, as the latter lacked coercive investigative capacity. Departmental inquiries initiated after July 2000 were stayed during the CBI investigation to avoid parallel proceedings and to allow the petitioner to assist the investigation freely, with any resumption requiring leave of the Court. Police protection was permitted to continue subject to periodic review and adjustment by the Commissioner of Police, Delhi.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 640 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298471</link>
      <description>Allegations of manipulation in public appointments, involving competing select lists and the risk of evidence being lost, were considered fit for investigation by the CBI rather than a Commission of Inquiry, as the latter lacked coercive investigative capacity. Departmental inquiries initiated after July 2000 were stayed during the CBI investigation to avoid parallel proceedings and to allow the petitioner to assist the investigation freely, with any resumption requiring leave of the Court. Police protection was permitted to continue subject to periodic review and adjustment by the Commissioner of Police, Delhi.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=298471</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>