Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2020 (5) TMI 587

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ase are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of P & P medicaments falling under Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. They manufacture the medicaments on job work basis (loan licensee basis) and also on their own account and sell it to their respective customers. In the case of their own manufactured products, even the physician samples are sold to their customers who in turn distributed free of cost. The appellants are determining the value of the medicaments sold to their customers by adopting the transaction value under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 when the goods were sold, but when it was manufactured on job work basis (loan licensee) valued the same by taking the cost of production + 10% as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....chem Pharmaceuticals Ind. Ltd. vs. CCE, Vapi - 2015 (322) ELT 808 (SC). She has further submitted that this Tribunal in the case of Medispray Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. vs. CCE, Goa - 2017 (5) GSTL 300 (Tri.-Mumbai), taking note of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, held that Rule 4 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 will not apply to the aforesaid situations. 4. Learned AR for the Revenue reiterated the findings of the learned Commissioner (Appeals). 5. Heard both sides and perused the records. 6. The short issue for consideration in the present appeals is whether the physician samples manufactured by the appellant on job work basis and sold on principal to principal basis to customers be valued as per Rule 4 of the Central Excise V....