<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 587 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395554</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that physician samples manufactured on job work basis and sold on principal to principal basis should be valued based on the cost of raw material + job charges, following principles laid down by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) and allowed the appeals, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 10:51:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=613838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 587 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395554</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that physician samples manufactured on job work basis and sold on principal to principal basis should be valued based on the cost of raw material + job charges, following principles laid down by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) and allowed the appeals, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395554</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>