Valuation of Physician Samples: Cost of Raw Material + Job Charges. Tribunal Follows Supreme Court Precedent

The Tribunal held that physician samples manufactured on job work basis and sold on principal to principal basis should be valued based on the cost of raw material + job charges, following principles laid down by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal set aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) and allowed the appeals, in line with the Supreme Court's precedent in similar cases.

---

---

Issues:
Valuation of physician samples manufactured on job work basis and sold on principal to principal basis.

Analysis:
The appeals were filed against an order passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai-III regarding the valuation of medicaments manufactured by the appellants. The appellants manufactured medicaments on job work basis and on their own account, including physician samples sold to customers. The revenue disputed the valuation method, demanding recovery of differential duty. The appellants valued goods sold on their own account based on transaction value under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, but valued goods manufactured on job work basis using cost of production + 10% as per Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The issue was whether physician samples manufactured on job work basis and sold on principal to principal basis should be valued under Rule 4 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 or Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal referred to judgments by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in relevant cases and held that Rule 4 valuation does not apply when goods are sold to the principal, irrespective of being physician samples. The valuation should be based on the cost of raw material + job charges, following principles laid down by the Supreme Court. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals, following the precedent established by the Supreme Court in similar cases.

---