2009 (5) TMI 994

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....P.K.R. Menon and Jose Joseph for the Respondent. JUDGMENT C.N. Ramachandran Nair, The question raised in the appeal filed by the assessee is whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessee is not entitled to carry over depreciation loss from 2002-03 to 2003-04, the years of assessment under appeal in this case. The assessee is a 100 per cent export oriented unit (EOU) whic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....years under s. 32(2) of the IT Act. It is not known as to what happened from the asst. yr. 2001-02. In any case while completing the assessment for 2002-03 the AO made an observation that unabsorbed depreciation is not available for carry forward or set off in the succeeding year which is the assessment under appeal in this case. The disallowance is seen made by the officer and confirmed by the Tr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s of it we feel that the order of assessment sustained by the Tribunal is not tenable because s. 10B(6) has no application for the asst. yr. 2003-04. The fact that unabsorbed depreciation carried over for several years is not allowable in the assessment year immediately following the end of the period of tax exemption does not mean that until such assessment year the assessee cannot carry forward ....