AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2012 (3) TMI 597
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....al by assessee against the order of ld. CIT (A) relating to assessment year 20077-08. 2. The assessee is objecting in confirming trading addition of Rs. 17,74,349/- made and confirmed by lower authorities by disallowing 25% on account of unverifiable purchases of Rs. 70,97,395/-. 3. During the assessment proceedings, the AO noted that assessee had made purchases of Rs. 70.97 lacs or odd from....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ibunal. 5. After considering the written submissions and arguments of ld. D/R, who placed reliance on the orders of the AO and ld. CIT (A), we find that assessee deserves to succeed in its appeal in part. The Jaipur Benches of the Tribunal is taking a consistent view that where certain purchases remain unverifiable then the rejection of books of account is justified. Therefore, we hold that rej....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ory and current events of the case. It is further seen that in immediately preceding year i.e. 2006-07 against disclosed GP rate of 24.78% the AO applied GP rate of 26.23%. The addition made by AO was deleted by ld. CIT (A) and the Tribunal has confirmed the order of ld. CIT (A) vide its order in ITA No. 457/JP/2009 dated 30.09.2009. The Tribunal has held that GP rate declared by assessee is quite....