1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal Partially Allows Appeal on Unverifiable Purchases in Tax Assessment</h1> The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against a trading addition related to unverifiable purchases in the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal held ... - Issues involved: Appeal against trading addition related to unverifiable purchases in assessment year 2007-08.Summary:The appellant contested the trading addition of Rs. 17,74,349/- due to disallowance of 25% on unverifiable purchases amounting to Rs. 70,97,395/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the contention of the assessee, suspecting involvement in receiving bogus purchase bills. The ld. CIT (A) upheld the AO's decision. The Tribunal considered the written submissions and held that while rejection of books of account is justified for unverifiable purchases, making additions solely on this basis is not justified. Referring to legal precedents, it was noted that additions should consider past history and current events. Given the significant increase in GP rate from the previous year, an addition of Rs. 1 lac was deemed sufficient to address any revenue leakage. Consequently, the appeal was partially allowed, with the judgment pronounced on 15.3.2012.