<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 597 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197095</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against a trading addition related to unverifiable purchases in the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal held that while rejection of books of account is justified for unverifiable purchases, making additions solely on this basis is not justified. Considering past history and current events, an addition of Rs. 1 lac was deemed sufficient to address any revenue leakage, leading to the partial allowance of the appeal on 15.3.2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 14:33:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 597 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197095</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against a trading addition related to unverifiable purchases in the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal held that while rejection of books of account is justified for unverifiable purchases, making additions solely on this basis is not justified. Considering past history and current events, an addition of Rs. 1 lac was deemed sufficient to address any revenue leakage, leading to the partial allowance of the appeal on 15.3.2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>