TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (10) TMI 306
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... petitioners has submitted that the impugned order of adjudication is bad due to violation of the principles of natural justice. He has pointed out that, copies of documents relied upon in the adjudication process were not given to the petitioners in spite of requests thereof. He has referred to an order passed in the earlier writ petition filed by the petitioner where certain directions were issued by the Writ Court with regard to the documents concerned. He has referred to the impugned order where the adjudicating authority has relied upon the evidences given by co-accused. He has submitted that such deponent was not allowed to be cross-examined. He has relied upon 2015 (322) E.L.T. 462 (Cal.) (Soumendu Saha vs. Union of India), All India....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tentions of the parties and the materials made available on record. The impugned order is appealable under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The petitioner was informed of the impugned order by a letter dated January 29, 2008. Such letter contains the statement that the impugned order is appealable. Despite a statutory appeal being available to the petitioner, it has chosen to move the writ jurisdiction. A Writ Court is not an appellate authority. A Writ Court is not called upon to reappraise the entire evidence to come to a finding of validity or lack of its impugned order. The scope of enquiry of a Writ Court with regard to a decision rendered by an authority acting under a statute particularly when there is a statutory a....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....he production thereof from the third parties with whom they were available. It is not the case of the petitioner that, the process of making the third parties produce the relevant documents were not available in law. Therefore it would not lie in the mouth of the petitioner to contend that, the documents sought to be relied upon were not made over to the petitioner and therefore there is a breach of principles of natural justice. The petitioners were informed of the time and location of such documents. Despite such information, the petitioner did not take steps to have such documents produced. The other area of the breach of principles of natural justice is that, the adjudicating authority has placed reliance on the evidence of the co-ac....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....so recovered. Documents were seized. The department is of the view that the petitioner is guilty of planned evasion of duty of Rs. 24,32,35,320/- during the period October 1994 to September, 1995. The impugned order narrates how the evasion was detected. The detection of the evasion and the findings with regard thereto have not been dislodged by the petitioner in the present petition. In any event, the petitioner had chosen not to file an appeal against the order. The Appellate Authority was better equipped to look into the evidence produced before the adjudicating authority to appreciate the evidence led before the adjudicating authority. In Soumendu Saha (supra) it has been held, that when the prosecutor had furnished a report from an ....