https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333286 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Central Excise adjudication order, citing no merit in the petitioner's arguments. The plea of limitation was rejected, and the interim order was vacated, with the request for a stay of the order refused. The Court emphasized the availability of a statutory appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act and highlighted the limited scope of a Writ Court in reviewing decisions when a statutory appeal is an option. The Court found no violation of natural justice in the adjudication process, supporting the department's actions regarding document requests and evidence reliance. en-us Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Feb 2017 12:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333286 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Central Excise adjudication order, citing no merit in the petitioner's arguments. The plea of limitation was rejected, and the interim order was vacated, with the request for a stay of the order refused. The Court emphasized the availability of a statutory appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act and highlighted the limited scope of a Writ Court in reviewing decisions when a statutory appeal is an option. The Court found no violation of natural justice in the adjudication process, supporting the department's actions regarding document requests and evidence reliance. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 29 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333286