2016 (10) TMI 305

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....i, Advocate  for the appellant Shri G. R. Singh, DR    for the Respondent ORDER These two appeals are directed against common adjudication order dated 10.03.2008 passed by the Commissioner of Central, Bhopal.  The brief facts of the case are that the appellant are engaged in the manufacture of bulk drugs  and medicaments liable to Central Excise duty.  T....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt is that the said goods were not manufactured or used in DTA unit and the same also could not have been procured under CT-3 certificate in terms of Notification No. 22/2003.  Upon conversion of DTA to EOU the goods lying in that portion of converted unit would amount to removal of these goods and thereby attract the reversal of credit in terms of Rule 3(5) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.&nbsp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed to avail cenvat credit on all these items.  Finally, the learned Counsel submitted that the matter is settled in their favour in their own case by the Tribunal vide Final Order No. 52172/ 2016- dated 14.06.2016.  He also relied on various case laws in support of his submission. 3.  Learned AR reiterated the findings of the original authority and held that  the premises of....