Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (1) TMI 229

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....issioner of Service Tax has demanded service tax of over Rs. 1.7 crores from the appellants in respect of 'Erection, Commissioning and Installation Services' for the period September, 2004 to March, 2006 in adjudication of a show-cause notice dated 9-2-2007. He has also imposed penalties on the party. After examinmg the records and hearing both sides, we note that the above demand is in respect of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tractors. Learned counsel has also raised the plea of limitation in respect of a part of the demand. It is fairly conceded that demand of service tax of over Rs. 7.7 lakhs, which pertains to the subject-matter of sub-contract awarded by M/s. Technip India Ltd., is within the normal period of limitation. Though, on merits, he claims prima facie case against this demand also, he submits that, for th....