https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4626 The tribunal directed the appellants to pre-deposit Rs. 7.7 lakhs within 4 weeks to address the service tax demand for 'Erection, Commissioning and Installation Services' from September 2004 to March 2006. The appellants' claim that main contractors had paid the service tax was not substantiated with concrete proof, necessitating the pre-deposit as a preliminary measure. Compliance was required by 3-3-2008, focusing on the sub-contract awarded by M/s. Technip India Ltd to resolve the pending demand efficiently. en-us Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4626 The tribunal directed the appellants to pre-deposit Rs. 7.7 lakhs within 4 weeks to address the service tax demand for 'Erection, Commissioning and Installation Services' from September 2004 to March 2006. The appellants' claim that main contractors had paid the service tax was not substantiated with concrete proof, necessitating the pre-deposit as a preliminary measure. Compliance was required by 3-3-2008, focusing on the sub-contract awarded by M/s. Technip India Ltd to resolve the pending demand efficiently. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4626