Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (1) TMI 230

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the impugned order, after revising an Order-in-Original dropping the proposal to demand service tax from the appellants, the Commissioner demanded service tax of Rs. 7,54,344/- along with appropriate interest and imposed penalties under Section 76 and Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 (the Act). The appellants had received technical know-how from a foreign collaborator along with right to use th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fer of technology. In the impugned order, the impugned services have been classified as "Consulting Engineer" service. 2. Moving the application, the learned counsel for the appellants submits that the Show Cause Notice issued by the original authority did not classify the impugned services under any category. Thus the order of the original authority was passed on the basis of a flawed Show Cau....