2015 (11) TMI 559

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ar, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Rakesh Goyal, Additional Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per: P.K. Jain Brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of bare copper wires, copper rods, enameled copper wire and were paying excise duty on fortnightly basis. A part of the duty was being paid from the credit of duty paid on inputs used in the manufacture of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was adjudicated. In the impugned order, the Commissioner confirmed the said demand and also imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,00,000/- on the main appellant under Rule 13 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 and Rs. 1,00,000/- on the second appellant under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Aggrieved by the said order, the appellants are before us. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The learned counsel fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....late the rules. It is the case of excess cenvat credit utilization for few days. 4. Learned AR reiterates the finding of the adjudicating authority. 5. We have gone through the records. The issue before us is only relating to the penalty imposed on the main appellant under Rule 13 of the Cenvat Credit Rules and on the second appellant under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules. We note that t....