<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 559 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267750</link>
    <description>Penalties for short-term excess utilisation of Cenvat credit during the introduction of the fortnightly duty payment scheme were held fit for waiver under the Cenvat Credit and Central Excise Rules. The Tribunal noted that the excess credit was used only for a few days, duty was regularly paid in later fortnights, and any payment through PLA in the relevant fortnight would have remained available for the next period. Without deciding the underlying legality of the utilisation issue, the Tribunal concluded that the facts justified setting aside the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 559 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267750</link>
      <description>Penalties for short-term excess utilisation of Cenvat credit during the introduction of the fortnightly duty payment scheme were held fit for waiver under the Cenvat Credit and Central Excise Rules. The Tribunal noted that the excess credit was used only for a few days, duty was regularly paid in later fortnights, and any payment through PLA in the relevant fortnight would have remained available for the next period. Without deciding the underlying legality of the utilisation issue, the Tribunal concluded that the facts justified setting aside the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=267750</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>