Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (6) TMI 301

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Yusuf, Addl Commissioner (AR) ORDER Per: Archana Wadhwa: Central Excise duty of Rs. 8.52 crores (approx.) stands confirmed against the appellant for the period November 2008 to March 2013 by raising a show-cause notice dt. 21/11/2013. 2. As per the facts on record, appellant is receiving duty paid chassis from M/s. Tata Motors Ltd., and are fabricating the bodies on the same. The duty paid on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....earing for the appellant fairly agrees that the issue of adoption of Rule 10A stands decided against them by the Tribunal's decision in the case of Audi Automobiles [2010 (249) ELT 214 (sic) (Tri. Delhi)], which stands followed by the other decisions of the Tribunal. However, he submits that apart from the demand being barred by limitation, the method of adopting the assessable value by the ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e is on account of the assessee himself. 5. Learned advocate has drawn our attention to various decisions of the Tribunal, some of which stand confirmed by the High Court. By a majority decision in the case of CCE, Panchkula Vs. Yamuna Gases & Chemicals Ltd. [2011 (271) ELT 209 (Tri. Del.)], it was held that making of adjustments between the excess paid duty and less paid duty would not amount to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....#39;ble High Court of Karnataka vide their order dt. 06/12/2013. In view of the above, we, at this prima facie stage, agree with the learned advocate that if they have paid excess duty on all clearances during the relevant period, such excesses have to be taken into account for confirming the demand of duty in terms of the provisions of Rule 10A of Central Excise Valuation Rules. If that is taken ....