https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260376 The Tribunal confirmed Central Excise duty of approximately &8377; 8.52 crores against the appellant for the period November 2008 to March 2013. The appellant's method of adopting the assessable value was disputed, leading to the demand confirmation. Despite the appellant's claim of excess duty payments, the adjudicating authority rejected it citing unjust enrichment. The Tribunal considered the limitation period issue and agreed to dispense with the pre-deposit condition, granting a stay petition for the appellant after they deposited a portion of the balance amount. en-us Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jun 2015 06:06:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260376 The Tribunal confirmed Central Excise duty of approximately &8377; 8.52 crores against the appellant for the period November 2008 to March 2013. The appellant's method of adopting the assessable value was disputed, leading to the demand confirmation. Despite the appellant's claim of excess duty payments, the adjudicating authority rejected it citing unjust enrichment. The Tribunal considered the limitation period issue and agreed to dispense with the pre-deposit condition, granting a stay petition for the appellant after they deposited a portion of the balance amount. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=260376