Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2015 (6) TMI 302

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ultant For the Respondent : Shri Pramod Kumar, JCDR ORDER Per: Rakesh Kumar: The appellant are manufacturers of motor vehicle parts chargeable to central excise duty. They availed Cenvat credit of central excise duty paid on inputs under service tax paid on input service as per Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. 2. In terms of provisions of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules 2002 the assessee were re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....5/- against which they paid the duty of Rs. 13,74,711/- and according to the appellant this was due to some clerical mistake, and as such there was short payment of Rs. 1174/-. Similarly during September 2011 the appellants monthly duty liability was Rs. 16,14,853/- against which the duty paid by the due date was Rs. 15,79,670/- and as such there were short payment of Rs. 35,184/-. 4. During scru....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....payment of duty and the clearances would be treated as having been made that payment of duty. It is on this basis that the Commissioner vide Order-in-Original dated 31.03.2014 has confirmed the demand of Rs. 1,19,71,942/- against the appellant company alongwith interest thereon under section 11AB and has imposed penalty of Rs. 10.00 Lakhs on them under Rule 25. Against this order of the Commission....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he forfeiture period till the assessee pays the outstanding amount including interest is unconstitutional and, therefore, the portion "without utilizing the Cenvat credit" in sub-rule (3A) of Rule 8 of Central Excise Rules 2002 shall be rendered invalid, that in view of this, the impugned order is without any basis. He therefore, pleaded that the requirement of pre-deposit of the duty demand and i....