1983 (3) TMI 279

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e, for the Appellants. Shri Mahesh Kumar, Sr. D.R., for the Respondents. ORDER This appeal is directed against the order of the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, Bombay dated 29th December, 1978. It was originally filed as a Revision Application before the Central Government, but on transfer it has been registered as an appeal. 2. The Appellants manufacture tooth past (dental....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s submits that the expression `such goods' occurring in Section 4 of the Act had not been correctly interpreted by the Collector. It is argued that the goods meant for gifts constitute a different class and cannot be equated with the goods which are meant for sale and, therefore, such goods be treated differently and not at par with the goods manufactured for the purposes of sale. We find no subst....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e the scope and meaning of "such goods" as is intended to be done. the expression "such goods" would cover all types of dental cream under the trade mark "Colgate" which are manufactured and sold by the factory, whether for sale or for free distribution. The Central Excise Officer is simply to consider the assessable value of the article when the same is taken out of the factory premises and wheth....