1983 (3) TMI 280

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ocate, for the Appellant Shri Mahesh Kumar, SDR, for the Respondent ORDER This appeal is directed against the order or the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, Bombay, dated 9th April, 1979. Originally it was filed as a Revision Application by the Central Government and on transfer it has been registered as an appeal. 2. The Appellants manufactured industrial tyres which were origina....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h had been allowed, but had not passed on to the customers, be added to the assessable value and be also subjected to payment of excise duty. (This amount was calculated to be Rs. 4,988). A reply was sent by the appellants but their contention was not accepted and the demand was confirmed. An appeal was preferred before the Appellate Collector who rejected the same on 9th April 1979. This is now t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rt decision : Vidarbha Mills Barar Ltd. and Others v Collector of Central Excise, Nagpur, 1979 E.L.T. (J 555), where it was held that :- "the words `from the date of making the refund' under Rule 10, postulate the date when refund vouchers are issued by the Department and not the date when such vouchers are encashed. Therefore, the date of the issue of voucher is the date from which the period ....