<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 279 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166068</link>
    <description>Toothpaste cleared as free gifts to school children and dentists was held to be assessable on the same basis as toothpaste sold in the market because the gifted goods were identical in quality and contents to the sold goods. The additional carton printing identifying the promotional distribution did not change the character of the product, and the post-clearance manner of disposal was irrelevant for valuation. The expression &quot;such goods&quot; was construed to cover the same class of dental cream manufactured by the assessee, whether intended for sale or free distribution, so valuation had to be made by reference to the price of goods ordinarily sold by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:55:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=363708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 279 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166068</link>
      <description>Toothpaste cleared as free gifts to school children and dentists was held to be assessable on the same basis as toothpaste sold in the market because the gifted goods were identical in quality and contents to the sold goods. The additional carton printing identifying the promotional distribution did not change the character of the product, and the post-clearance manner of disposal was irrelevant for valuation. The expression &quot;such goods&quot; was construed to cover the same class of dental cream manufactured by the assessee, whether intended for sale or free distribution, so valuation had to be made by reference to the price of goods ordinarily sold by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>