Home / 
2013 (3) TMI 135
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....bsp; JUDGMENT Petitioner is a dealer under the KVAT Act. The 2nd respondent conducted an inspection of his premises on 25/7/2009. The offence detected was compounded on payment of compounding fee. The petitioner thereafter filed Ext.P2 request dated 4/8/2011 seeking to permit him to revise his return for the month of July, 2009. Order on that request was not communicated to him. ....