TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Prompt Orders on Revision Request & Suspension of Assessment Notice</h1> <h3>PV. VEERENDRANATH, M/s. HOME STYLE Versus THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, KODUNGALLUR</h3> PV. VEERENDRANATH, M/s. HOME STYLE Versus THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, KODUNGALLUR - TMI Issues:1. Delay in communicating order on request for return revision.2. Issuance of notice for assessment during pendency of the request.Analysis:1. The petitioner, a dealer under the KVAT Act, had his premises inspected by the 2nd respondent on 25/7/2009. An offence was detected and compounded upon payment of a fee. Subsequently, the petitioner filed a request (Ext.P2) on 4/8/2011 to revise his return for July 2009. However, no order on this request was communicated to him. Meanwhile, the 1st respondent issued a notice (Ext.P4) under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act proposing to complete the assessment. The petitioner, aggrieved by Ext.P4 issued during the pendency of Ext.P2, filed a writ petition seeking redress.2. The court, upon adjournment, directed the Government Pleader to confirm if any order on Ext.P2 had been communicated to the petitioner. It was revealed that no such communication had been served. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition by instructing the 1st respondent to pass orders on Ext.P2 and communicate them to the petitioner promptly, within two weeks of the judgment's copy being produced. Additionally, all further proceedings related to Ext.P4 were ordered to be put on hold until the communication of orders on Ext.P2. The petitioner was directed to provide a copy of the judgment and the writ petition to the 1st respondent for compliance.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
