Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to a direction to the assessing authority to decide the pending request for permission to revise the return and to keep further proceedings in abeyance until such decision was taken.
Analysis: The request for permission to revise the return had been made and no order on that request had been communicated. In that situation, continuation of assessment proceedings based on the notice issued under Section 25(1) would not be appropriate until the pending request was decided and communicated. The appropriate course was to require the authority to act on the request expeditiously and, meanwhile, defer further proceedings.
Conclusion: The petition was disposed of by directing the first respondent to pass orders on the revision request and communicate the decision to the petitioner within two weeks, and to keep further proceedings pursuant to the notice in abeyance until then.