<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 135 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221368</link>
    <description>Where a request for permission to revise a return was pending and no decision had been communicated, continuation of assessment proceedings based on the notice under Section 25(1) was considered inappropriate until that request was decided. The assessing authority was directed to dispose of the revision request expeditiously, communicate the decision to the taxpayer, and keep further proceedings in abeyance meanwhile.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 10:20:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=194724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 135 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221368</link>
      <description>Where a request for permission to revise a return was pending and no decision had been communicated, continuation of assessment proceedings based on the notice under Section 25(1) was considered inappropriate until that request was decided. The assessing authority was directed to dispose of the revision request expeditiously, communicate the decision to the taxpayer, and keep further proceedings in abeyance meanwhile.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=221368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>