Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (12) TMI 603

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... -  Brief facts of the case are that on 25-10-2005, a team of the Central Excise officers of H.Q. Preventive, Mumbai-III intercepted two trucks carrying 800 bags of LLDPE Plastic granules of M/s. J.J. Polyplast Ltd., Mumbai. Investigations revealed that M/s. Gayatri Industries, Silvassa purchased 49.5 MT of LLDPE plastic granules of Grade LLN1001XI (Batch No. 36813) manufactured by M/s. Exxo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Original Adjudicating Authority ordered recovery of Cenvat Credit of Rs. 2,50,875/- taken by the appellants along with interest and also imposed equivalent amount as penalty. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the order on appeal filed by the appellants and hence the Revenue has filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals). 3. Heard both the sides. Ld. DR pointed out t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ts on record it has been shown that actual duty paid by M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. was more than the credit taken by the respondents and therefore there is no revenue loss to the Department. He submits that there is no error in the Commissioner (Appeals) order since availment of credit where goods have been received but the invoice is not exactly in their name. Therefore he submits that the rel....