2008 (12) TMI 605

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Micheal, Jt. CDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - T his appeal has been filed against the rejection of refund claim filed by the appellants in respect of accumulated Cenvat credit amounting to Rs. 7,57,455/-. 2. The ld. Advocate Shri Dhaval K. Shah appearing on behalf of the appellants submits that w.e.f. 9-7-2004, they stopped paying duty on the finished product but because of the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e licence is surrendered. The appellant's case is also similar to this but he submits that in view of the fact that LB had not taken into account the judgment of Hon'ble Karnataka High Court, the benefit may be extended. 3. The ld. Jt. CDR on the other hand points out that M/s. Slovak India Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. case was a sort of unique case in the sense by the time the appellant succeede....