<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 603 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125749</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in a case involving the recovery of Cenvat Credit and penalty imposition. The Tribunal found that the respondents were not at fault for the contravention of Cenvat Credit Rules as they were unaware of the job worker&#039;s actions in replacing raw materials. Relying on a decision of the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court, the Tribunal concluded that the respondents should not be penalized since the duty paid exceeded the credit taken, resulting in no revenue loss. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming that the appellants had not caused any revenue loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 17:52:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 603 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125749</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in a case involving the recovery of Cenvat Credit and penalty imposition. The Tribunal found that the respondents were not at fault for the contravention of Cenvat Credit Rules as they were unaware of the job worker&#039;s actions in replacing raw materials. Relying on a decision of the Hon&#039;ble Bombay High Court, the Tribunal concluded that the respondents should not be penalized since the duty paid exceeded the credit taken, resulting in no revenue loss. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming that the appellants had not caused any revenue loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>