<h1>High Court Upholds Attachment of Property for HUF's Tax Dues Despite Daughter-in-Law's Claim of Separate Ownership.</h1> M/s. Raja Ram Kishan Chand (HUF) was in default on income-tax dues, leading to the attachment of property No.110 in Mirzapur on November 7, 1973. The daughter-in-law, who purchased property No.107 in the same area in 1980, claimed it was not part of the attachment. She argued that the property belonged to Raja Ram individually and should not be used to recover the HUF's dues. The Tax Recovery Officer and the High Court upheld the attachment, deeming the sale void and confirming the property was included in the original attachment order.