<h1>State and city challenge federal reassignment of Guard as unlawful circumvention of Insurrection Act 10 U.S.C. § 333</h1> Federal authorities reassigned federalized National Guard personnel from other states to assist in protecting federal property after a federal judge temporarily enjoined deployment of that state's Guard to a city. The state, a neighboring state and the city moved for an amended temporary restraining order, arguing the redeployments unlawfully circumvent the court order and exceed the president's narrow statutory authority to federalize troops (limited to repelling invasions, suppressing rebellions or enforcing federal law). The judge found the limited, localized protests did not justify federalized forces and raised state-sovereignty concerns; litigation over the scope of federal control and deployment authority remains pending.