https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=57862 A federal injunction halted deployment of a State's federally activated National Guard to protect federal property after a court found localized protests did not justify federalized forces. Plaintiffs-state, city, and another State-argue the president's authority to federalize and redeploy Guard troops is limited to repelling invasions, suppressing rebellions, or enforcing federal law, and that reassigning federally controlled personnel to another State or changing their mission exceeds legal authority and violates state sovereignty, prompting an amended request to bar such deployments. en-us Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:31:03 +0530 Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:31:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=57862 A federal injunction halted deployment of a State's federally activated National Guard to protect federal property after a court found localized protests did not justify federalized forces. Plaintiffs-state, city, and another State-argue the president's authority to federalize and redeploy Guard troops is limited to repelling invasions, suppressing rebellions, or enforcing federal law, and that reassigning federally controlled personnel to another State or changing their mission exceeds legal authority and violates state sovereignty, prompting an amended request to bar such deployments. News - Mon, 06 Oct 2025 09:31:03 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=57862