Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Natural gas supplied under the GSPA was held to be an inter-State sale concluded at Gadimoga in Andhra Pradesh, where delivery, measurement, title and risk passed to the buyer's designee; the subsequent movement through a common carrier pipeline into Uttar Pradesh was only transportation and did not convert the transaction into an intra-State sale. Co-mingling, re-metering, fungibility and processing during transit did not alter the sale's character, and Uttar Pradesh therefore lacked jurisdiction to levy VAT. Explanation 3 to Section 3 of the CST Act was treated as clarificatory, reflecting the pre-existing legal position and applying to the original scheme of the provision.
Natural gas supplied under the GSPA was held to be an inter-State sale concluded at Gadimoga in Andhra Pradesh, where delivery, measurement, title and risk passed to the buyer's designee; the subsequent movement through a common carrier pipeline into Uttar Pradesh was only transportation and did not convert the transaction into an intra-State sale. Co-mingling, re-metering, fungibility and processing during transit did not alter the sale's character, and Uttar Pradesh therefore lacked jurisdiction to levy VAT. Explanation 3 to Section 3 of the CST Act was treated as clarificatory, reflecting the pre-existing legal position and applying to the original scheme of the provision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
