<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Inter-State sale of natural gas through a common carrier pipeline was confirmed, defeating Uttar Pradesh VAT jurisdiction.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99855</link>
    <description>Natural gas supplied under the GSPA was held to be an inter-State sale concluded at Gadimoga in Andhra Pradesh, where delivery, measurement, title and risk passed to the buyer&#039;s designee; the subsequent movement through a common carrier pipeline into Uttar Pradesh was only transportation and did not convert the transaction into an intra-State sale. Co-mingling, re-metering, fungibility and processing during transit did not alter the sale&#039;s character, and Uttar Pradesh therefore lacked jurisdiction to levy VAT. Explanation 3 to Section 3 of the CST Act was treated as clarificatory, reflecting the pre-existing legal position and applying to the original scheme of the provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:40:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:40:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Inter-State sale of natural gas through a common carrier pipeline was confirmed, defeating Uttar Pradesh VAT jurisdiction.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99855</link>
      <description>Natural gas supplied under the GSPA was held to be an inter-State sale concluded at Gadimoga in Andhra Pradesh, where delivery, measurement, title and risk passed to the buyer&#039;s designee; the subsequent movement through a common carrier pipeline into Uttar Pradesh was only transportation and did not convert the transaction into an intra-State sale. Co-mingling, re-metering, fungibility and processing during transit did not alter the sale&#039;s character, and Uttar Pradesh therefore lacked jurisdiction to levy VAT. Explanation 3 to Section 3 of the CST Act was treated as clarificatory, reflecting the pre-existing legal position and applying to the original scheme of the provision.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 08:40:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>