Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2601 to 2620 of 96000 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Natural gas supplied under the GSPA was held to be an inter-State sale concluded at Gadimoga in Andhra Pradesh, where delivery, measurement, title and risk passed to the buyer's designee; the subsequent movement through a common carrier pipeline into Uttar Pradesh was only transportation and did not convert the transaction into an intra-State sale. Co-mingling, re-metering, fungibility and processing during transit did not alter the sale's character, and Uttar Pradesh therefore lacked jurisdiction to levy VAT. Explanation 3 to Section 3 of the CST Act was treated as clarificatory, reflecting the pre-existing legal position and applying to the original scheme of the provision.
Natural gas supplied under the GSPA was held to be an inter-State sale concluded at Gadimoga in Andhra Pradesh, where delivery, measurement, title and risk passed to the buyer's designee; the subsequent movement through a common carrier pipeline into Uttar Pradesh was only transportation and did not convert the transaction into an intra-State sale. Co-mingling, re-metering, fungibility and processing during transit did not alter the sale's character, and Uttar Pradesh therefore lacked jurisdiction to levy VAT. Explanation 3 to Section 3 of the CST Act was treated as clarificatory, reflecting the pre-existing legal position and applying to the original scheme of the provision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
