Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Each capital gains transaction was treated as a separate source of income, so section 90(2) allowed the assessee to apply the India-Singapore DTAA to one transaction and the Act to another where more beneficial. The Tribunal rejected compulsory aggregation of all capital gains and losses under the head of capital gains, holding that source-wise treaty choice cannot be overridden by a uniform application of the Act. Gains from shares acquired before 01.04.2017 and covered by Article 13(4A) of the treaty were outside taxable income in India and could not be brought into the Act's computation for set-off purposes. The addition was deleted.
Each capital gains transaction was treated as a separate source of income, so section 90(2) allowed the assessee to apply the India-Singapore DTAA to one transaction and the Act to another where more beneficial. The Tribunal rejected compulsory aggregation of all capital gains and losses under the head of capital gains, holding that source-wise treaty choice cannot be overridden by a uniform application of the Act. Gains from shares acquired before 01.04.2017 and covered by Article 13(4A) of the treaty were outside taxable income in India and could not be brought into the Act's computation for set-off purposes. The addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
