Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Each capital gains transaction was treated as a separate source of income, so section 90(2) allowed the assessee to apply the India-Singapore DTAA to one transaction and the Act to another where more beneficial. The Tribunal rejected compulsory aggregation of all capital gains and losses under the head of capital gains, holding that source-wise treaty choice cannot be overridden by a uniform application of the Act. Gains from shares acquired before 01.04.2017 and covered by Article 13(4A) of the treaty were outside taxable income in India and could not be brought into the Act's computation for set-off purposes. The addition was deleted.
Each capital gains transaction was treated as a separate source of income, so section 90(2) allowed the assessee to apply the India-Singapore DTAA to one transaction and the Act to another where more beneficial. The Tribunal rejected compulsory aggregation of all capital gains and losses under the head of capital gains, holding that source-wise treaty choice cannot be overridden by a uniform application of the Act. Gains from shares acquired before 01.04.2017 and covered by Article 13(4A) of the treaty were outside taxable income in India and could not be brought into the Act's computation for set-off purposes. The addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
