Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Each capital gains transaction was treated as a separate source of income, so section 90(2) allowed the assessee to apply the India-Singapore DTAA to one transaction and the Act to another where more beneficial. The Tribunal rejected compulsory aggregation of all capital gains and losses under the head of capital gains, holding that source-wise treaty choice cannot be overridden by a uniform application of the Act. Gains from shares acquired before 01.04.2017 and covered by Article 13(4A) of the treaty were outside taxable income in India and could not be brought into the Act's computation for set-off purposes. The addition was deleted.
Each capital gains transaction was treated as a separate source of income, so section 90(2) allowed the assessee to apply the India-Singapore DTAA to one transaction and the Act to another where more beneficial. The Tribunal rejected compulsory aggregation of all capital gains and losses under the head of capital gains, holding that source-wise treaty choice cannot be overridden by a uniform application of the Act. Gains from shares acquired before 01.04.2017 and covered by Article 13(4A) of the treaty were outside taxable income in India and could not be brought into the Act's computation for set-off purposes. The addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
