Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Educational institution exemption upheld for Government-financed assessee, with prior ruling followed and assessment additions falling away.
    Bogus purchase disallowance limited to five percent where confirmations were partly absent and books were not rejected.
    Rectification under section 254(2) cannot be used to review merits; only obvious record errors can be corrected.
    Search assessment disputes: section 68 credits, bogus purchases, stock reconciliation and seized-noting verification shaped the tribunal's findings.
    Transfer pricing, section 41(1), and capital receipt treatment of incentives shaped the tribunal's mixed tax ruling.
    Delay condonation and misreporting under section 270A: ITAT rejected the belated quantum appeal but deleted penalty for disclosed facts.
    Reasoned policy relaxation orders required; unreasoned rejection of export relief request was set aside and remanded.
    Declared value of used machinery cannot be enhanced solely on a local engineer's certificate when Load Port evidence is substantially complete.
    Reopening of finally assessed Bills of Entry barred without examination evidence, while live import undervaluation justified revised value and duty.
    Ceramic classification under CTH 6902 9010 upheld; Chemical Examiner's reports accepted and extended limitation rejected for no suppression.
    Concessional customs duty on identical goods upheld; appeals on unactioned Bills of Entry dismissed as not maintainable.
    Appellate remedy, BIS certification and transaction value protections prevented confiscation, misdescription findings and valuation enhancement.
    Classification of populated smartphone sub-assemblies under customs tariff favours heading 8517.79.10 over printed circuit board heading 8534.
    Statutory auditor prosecution quashed for absence of specific allegations and mens rea, despite valid complaint and no limitation bar.
    Successive insolvency applications barred after finality, with concealment of prior appeal defeating relief and attracting costs.
    Committee of Creditors commercial wisdom upheld in rejecting resolution plans and annulling the insolvency process.
    Monetary limit for departmental appeals barred the Revenue's challenge, and no substantial question of law arose.
    PMLA attachment overrides secured creditor priority, with release or restoration to be sought before the Special Court.
    Reasoned appellate orders in service tax disputes must respect prior findings on works contracts and exemption unless new facts emerge.
    Direct nexus test for electricity transmission services upheld; works contract and manpower services exempt, rent-a-cab demand time-barred.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The Tribunal held that the enhanced leave-encashment exemption...

Beneficial leave-encashment exemption amendment applied retrospectively to pending matters, extending the higher ceiling.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax May 16, 2026 Case Laws AT
The Tribunal held that the enhanced leave-encashment exemption ceiling of Rs. 25 lakhs under section 10(10AA)(ii), introduced by CBDT Notification No. 31/2023, was beneficial and remedial in nature and therefore applied to pending matters for assessment year 2020-21. It reasoned that the notification did not create a new exemption but removed a disparity between government and non-government employees, and that denying the higher ceiling to persons retiring before the notification would create an artificial distinction contrary to the amendment's object. The restriction of exemption to Rs. 3 lakhs was held unsustainable, and the leave encashment received within the enhanced ceiling was allowed as exempt.

Topics

Acts Income Tax