<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Beneficial leave-encashment exemption amendment applied retrospectively to pending matters, extending the higher ceiling.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the enhanced leave-encashment exemption ceiling of Rs. 25 lakhs under section 10(10AA)(ii), introduced by CBDT Notification No. 31/2023, was beneficial and remedial in nature and therefore applied to pending matters for assessment year 2020-21. It reasoned that the notification did not create a new exemption but removed a disparity between government and non-government employees, and that denying the higher ceiling to persons retiring before the notification would create an artificial distinction contrary to the amendment&#039;s object. The restriction of exemption to Rs. 3 lakhs was held unsustainable, and the leave encashment received within the enhanced ceiling was allowed as exempt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 09:09:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 09:09:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=902313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Beneficial leave-encashment exemption amendment applied retrospectively to pending matters, extending the higher ceiling.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the enhanced leave-encashment exemption ceiling of Rs. 25 lakhs under section 10(10AA)(ii), introduced by CBDT Notification No. 31/2023, was beneficial and remedial in nature and therefore applied to pending matters for assessment year 2020-21. It reasoned that the notification did not create a new exemption but removed a disparity between government and non-government employees, and that denying the higher ceiling to persons retiring before the notification would create an artificial distinction contrary to the amendment&#039;s object. The restriction of exemption to Rs. 3 lakhs was held unsustainable, and the leave encashment received within the enhanced ceiling was allowed as exempt.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 09:09:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=99834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>