Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
A single show-cause notice or composite assessment order cannot cover more than one tax period under Sections 73 and 74 of the GST Act, 2017. Following its earlier Division Bench view, the HC held that separate proceedings are required for each assessment year once the annual return due date has passed. As the impugned order covered multiple financial years in one proceeding, it was set aside. The Court did not examine the other grounds and left them open. Fresh proceedings may be initiated separately for each assessment year, with exclusion of the intervening period for limitation.
A single show-cause notice or composite assessment order cannot cover more than one tax period under Sections 73 and 74 of the GST Act, 2017. Following its earlier Division Bench view, the HC held that separate proceedings are required for each assessment year once the annual return due date has passed. As the impugned order covered multiple financial years in one proceeding, it was set aside. The Court did not examine the other grounds and left them open. Fresh proceedings may be initiated separately for each assessment year, with exclusion of the intervening period for limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
