Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
A single show-cause notice or composite assessment order cannot cover more than one tax period under Sections 73 and 74 of the GST Act, 2017. Following its earlier Division Bench view, the HC held that separate proceedings are required for each assessment year once the annual return due date has passed. As the impugned order covered multiple financial years in one proceeding, it was set aside. The Court did not examine the other grounds and left them open. Fresh proceedings may be initiated separately for each assessment year, with exclusion of the intervening period for limitation.
A single show-cause notice or composite assessment order cannot cover more than one tax period under Sections 73 and 74 of the GST Act, 2017. Following its earlier Division Bench view, the HC held that separate proceedings are required for each assessment year once the annual return due date has passed. As the impugned order covered multiple financial years in one proceeding, it was set aside. The Court did not examine the other grounds and left them open. Fresh proceedings may be initiated separately for each assessment year, with exclusion of the intervening period for limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
