Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
901 to 920 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A pending claim for monetary reward under CBDT reward guidelines concerned an Income Tax Department officer who asserted exceptional and meritorious service in detecting TDS defaults, gathering intelligence, creating substantial tax demands, and effecting revenue recovery. A prior recommendation in the petitioner's favour was already on record, so the HC directed the petitioner to file that recommendation, the order, and the writ petition before the competent respondent. The claim was then to be examined and decided strictly in accordance with law through a reasoned and speaking order within 45 days of submission.
A pending claim for monetary reward under CBDT reward guidelines concerned an Income Tax Department officer who asserted exceptional and meritorious service in detecting TDS defaults, gathering intelligence, creating substantial tax demands, and effecting revenue recovery. A prior recommendation in the petitioner's favour was already on record, so the HC directed the petitioner to file that recommendation, the order, and the writ petition before the competent respondent. The claim was then to be examined and decided strictly in accordance with law through a reasoned and speaking order within 45 days of submission.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.